CHEN Yuan-xin, XU Jie-zhong, XU Ze-han, SHI Xiao, WANG Xing-yue
Using the urban natural environment to create outdoor sports space is an important way to enrich the supply of national fitness space and meet the diversified fitness needs of the people. This approach is of great significance for creating high-quality urban outdoor sports destinations and stimulating the vitality of outdoor sports consumption. By employing the methods of literature review, logical analysis, and comparative analysis, this paper discusses the logic, dilemmas, experiences, and insights related to the construction of urban outdoor sports space. According to the research, urban outdoor sports space includes four types: direct opening of natural resources, organic embedding of supporting facilities, construction of exclusive site facilities, and composite utilization of other sites. The construction of urban outdoor sports space holds value in resolving the dilemma of national fitness space, aiding the construction of beautiful cities, and supporting the spatial coordination of industrial elements. However, it also faces challenges such as the imbalance between ecological protection and functional development, the dislocation between rigid planning and elastic demand, the lack of scenes for technology embedding and business combination, and the weak mechanism for social capital and public participation. The successful experiences of developed countries mainly include adhering to the design concept of organic unity between ecological protection and spatial expansion, emphasizing the development layout of spatial integration and the effective connection of multi-dimensional needs, creating a use scenario driven by the integration of digital enabling and business forms, and establishing a long-term collaborative management mechanism of government guidance and multiple co-governance. Based on these insights, the paper proposes local inspirations: to pay attention to the concept of upgrading dimensions and realize the effective coupling of space utilization and ecological bottom line; to break through the boundaries of development and build a planning system compatible with overall space planning and demand; to promote scene innovation and foster the symbiotic empowerment of digital technology and business mode integration; and to innovate in institutional design to improve the coordination mechanism between effective markets and successful governments.